BBO Discussion Forums: To save or not to save - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

To save or not to save against 3NT

Poll: To save or not to save (34 member(s) have cast votes)

Your bid?

  1. Pass (27 votes [79.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 79.41%

  2. 4S (5 votes [14.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.71%

  3. Other (2 votes [5.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.88%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   andrei 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 324
  • Joined: 2008-March-31

Posted 2014-December-03, 23:25



IMPS
2S: 5+ spades and 4+ minor
Don't argue with a fool. He has a rested brain
Before internet age you had a suspicion there are lots of "not-so-smart" people on the planet. Now you even know their names.
0

#2 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,836
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2014-December-03, 23:31

I think that if you want to save, against good players, you save the round before. Bidding 3 then 4 gives them way too much information. Now they have forcing passes, doubles, etc. I am not saying I would have saved the round before...it was far from clear that they would/could bid 3N, and they won't be bidding 4 (altho you'd love it if they did). I think, however, that saving now is wrong in principle even if it is right on the actual layout.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
7

#3 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2014-December-04, 00:22

4S immediately, pass now.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#4 User is offline   WesleyC 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 878
  • Joined: 2009-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2014-December-04, 00:35

As usual I completely agree with mikeh!

With such a chunky holding in hearts, there's also a possibility that 3NT is going down. Partner is allowed to hold a hands like [Qxxxx x AQJx xxx] or [Axxxx xx KQxx xx] where the opps only have 8 tricks.
0

#5 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2014-December-04, 03:32

Pass.

mikeh and WesleyC comments are right on point.

What was there 3 NT game bid based upon? Much more likely than not, the game has simply been bid on HC strength. That means they probably have plenty of winners to cash against any save you make.

If you are going to save, then you are going to need something to offset those winners. That something has to be distribution, so you and partner can ruff out some of their winners.

Unfortunately, your hand has a relatively flat distribution. There's no ruffing "protection" in your hand from the opponents cashing side suit winners except your high card holding in .

Where you want to consider saving is when you hold shortness in suits especially suits partner is likely to be long in. Hands like J109x Axxxx - xxxx or even J109x Axx Jxxxx x are much more conducive to saving. With partner marked with 9+ cards in and a minor, would seem to be the suit partner is most likely to be short in. So shortness outside of would seem to be better than shortness in . Likewise, length in one minor and shortness in the other will likely complement partner's holding. If you both have length in the same minor, it may limit the winners and potential ruffs in that suit. If you neither holds the other's minor, then a potential crossruff may be available.
1

#6 User is offline   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,060
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2014-December-04, 09:40

I'm joining everybody. One of my mottos is "once you've decided your hand is X, it's X, live with it." The issue is that if you bid 4 now, then you're saying that 3 the last round was a mistake. And it might have been. But it might not have been, in which case 4 *is* a mistake. So, once you change your mind, you're guaranteed to have made a mistake; it's just a matter of which one (and if it is the former, you're giving them much more information to make the last decision).

Now, obviously, this does not supersede "re-evaluate your hand as the auction goes along." But here, absolutely nothing has changed - partner still has a 6-card suit and a weak hand, you're still white-on-red, they have enough strength to try 3NT if they have a spade stopper, which they do, ... So, you decided this hand was a 3 call because (one assumes) you have a shot at setting 3NT - which you certainly do if they don't have 7 minor tricks off the hoof to go along with the two major aces. If you didn't think you could set 3NT, then you should have bid 4 before. You chose not to, so back your judgement.

Now, maybe you only bid 3 here because either your area doesn't handle preempts well and 3 is often enough, or nobody else will push hard either, and you'll be going down one more than the field, or you haven't yet learned why you "preempt as hard as you're ever going to, the first time". Unfortunately, "maybe I can buy it for this" is usually a losing strategy.
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#7 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,417
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2014-December-04, 10:23

Nothing to add to mikeh, except I am intrigued by the "other" (not Pass or 4S). Fortunately it is a closed poll, or men in white coats might be paying him or her a visit.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#8 User is offline   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,060
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2014-December-04, 13:10

I'm guessing the "other" is "call the TD, they can't bid 3NT over 4"
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#9 User is offline   tobycurtis 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 17
  • Joined: 2012-August-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hiroshima, Japan
  • Interests:Bridge & badminton

Posted 2014-December-05, 04:40

I'm wondering whether a double here would be purely penalty, or whether it could have a lead-directing meaning. Dummy's double is suggestive of hearts, so ideally our double would be suggesting a heart lead?? Is that asking too much? :rolleyes:
0

#10 User is offline   the_clown 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 645
  • Joined: 2010-December-02

Posted 2014-December-05, 04:46

Agree with 3, pass now. Bidding 4 the first time is asking for 800-1100, besides there is no guarantee they can make game.
0

#11 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2014-December-05, 04:57

View Postmycroft, on 2014-December-04, 13:10, said:

I'm guessing the "other" is "call the TD, they can't bid 3NT over 4"


Correct. The "other" was my vote. 4S is my first bid as I stated.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#12 User is offline   dicklont 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 750
  • Joined: 2007-October-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands
  • Interests:Bridge, music, sports

Posted 2014-December-05, 05:56

Pass. There is no garantee that they will make 3NT.
Of course they could have A A and 7 tricks from top in the minors, but changes are that the heart suit is a dissapointment, the spade stop could Kxx and the minor suits don't run as smoothly as the had hoped.
--
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
0

#13 User is offline   The_Badger 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,125
  • Joined: 2013-January-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, Chess, Film, Literature, Herbal Medicine, Nutrition

Posted 2014-December-05, 07:25

I wasn't going to reply as 'Pass' seemed so so (and very very) obvious BUT what I'd like to know is what range is the 2opening bid and how much can we trust partner to open with a suit topped by 2 honours? (I presume the KQ or AQ here). Partner is (99% of the time I assume) still going to lead a against 3NT, and does dbl. commands him to lead a , or does it ask him to try another suit? Mmmm....

Yes, I am contemplating dbl. as a bid, however unwise it seems...but it does depend on what sort of suits and hands partner opens non-vulnerable in 1st position.

There is a certain logic in this (in my opinion). Few partnerships are going to open 2 except if they have a 6 card suit, and just as few partnerships are going to be 'bounced' into a 3NT contract. If 3NT makes it is going to be a bad score for E/W anyway.

At IMPs -200 is usually a bad score, so if we can put it down by one trick (4 + 1 outside) then let's go for it.

All rather hypothetical: ok I'll be a wuss and 'Pass' as it just seems the sensible thing to do.
0

#14 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,068
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

Posted 2014-December-05, 08:21

Would it have been crazy to make a lead-directing 3 bid instead of 3?
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#15 User is offline   dicklont 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 750
  • Joined: 2007-October-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands
  • Interests:Bridge, music, sports

Posted 2014-December-05, 08:42

View Posthelene_t, on 2014-December-05, 08:21, said:

Would it have been crazy to make a lead-directing 3 bid instead of 3?

On the contrary, I think that is a great call.
--
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
0

#16 User is offline   fourdad 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 268
  • Joined: 2013-March-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Florida
  • Interests:Bridge, Football, Coaching, Family, Writing

Posted 2014-December-05, 08:48

View Postthe hog, on 2014-December-04, 00:22, said:

4S immediately, pass now.



BINGO!!! 4!s right away!
0

#17 User is offline   the_clown 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 645
  • Joined: 2010-December-02

Posted 2014-December-05, 09:00

View Posthelene_t, on 2014-December-05, 08:21, said:

Would it have been crazy to make a lead-directing 3 bid instead of 3?


Not crazy, but it gives them one more round of bidding and may talk them out of 4. If I knew they are bidding 3N, I would bid 3.
0

#18 User is offline   WesleyC 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 878
  • Joined: 2009-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2014-December-06, 07:40

I think 3H is a terrible choice! One of the main reasons you're bidding 3S on this hand is in the hope that the opponents will end up in 4H.

Also, you're relatively happy to get a spade lead!
0

#19 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2014-December-06, 09:21

View PostWesleyC, on 2014-December-06, 07:40, said:

I think 3H is a terrible choice! One of the main reasons you're bidding 3S on this hand is in the hope that the opponents will end up in 4H.

Also, you're relatively happy to get a spade lead!

We agree.
0

#20 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2014-December-06, 09:49

i'd save. people are spiting themselves. we took a reasonable gamble on the previous round, hoping they'd get to 4. the gamble lost, but that doesn't mean we should bend over and write -600. that they didn't bid 4 improves our hand for offense - partner is now likely to have at least 2 hearts (which also means a doubleton or shorter in the minors). with no aces, nothing in the minors and lho likely to have length there i make the opps big favourites to make 3nt
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users