BBO Discussion Forums: Nuanced Meaning? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Nuanced Meaning?

#1 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2014-November-14, 11:23

Had an interesting (perhaps) sequence last night, and I am curious as to whether I am out of my mind (this time -- I will concede general insanity).

The auction at MP, all red, starts:

P(me)-1(could be short)-1-X

1NT-2-P-P-

2NT

First, before reading on, what would you interpret 2NT to mean?

Now,
Spoiler




"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
1

#2 User is offline   glen 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,637
  • Joined: 2003-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ottawa, Canada
  • Interests:Military history, WW II wargames

Posted 2014-November-14, 12:17

I like redouble on the max hands with doubleton M support

In that context, 2NT here would 5/4 either way in the minors
'I hit my peak at seven' Taylor Swift
1

#3 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2014-November-14, 14:08

View Postglen, on 2014-November-14, 12:17, said:

I like redouble on the max hands with doubleton M support

In that context, 2NT here would 5/4 either way in the minors

Yes. I changed the actual auction to get away from a bizarre other part. The actual auction has Responder bid 1S rather than double because the opponents, strangely, do not use negative doubles. Hence, redouble was not anoption.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
1

#4 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2014-November-14, 15:44

Ken, I don't know what is the optimal use for that 2NT, but if I was your pd at the table, I would never think you are inviting for 3 NT, nor I would think you have a tolerance.

I would simply think that you are trying to find a minor fit at 3 level since they already found a fit, to play or to push them to 3 level. In that context, I would do it with any 5-4 minors and sometimes 4-4 minors at MP.

So you and I would never reach to game and probably got a worse score than +180 in a 3m contract, or at best I would let you play in 2 NT. Because I do not expect you to have a maximum for your bid necessarily. You had max and made too many tricks, you could have been minimum and just made 2 NT or 3m when they were making 2 or going down less than +200 for us in 2. If we expect you to have max, then we would have to pass with non-max hands and lose the competition often.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#5 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2014-November-14, 16:54

If your hand is worth an invitational 2NT now, why was it worth only1NT on the previous round? Did it improve when RHO raised spades?

2NT obviously shows both minors. That is consistent with the bidding, because:
- We couldn't show both minors on the previous round.
- The spade raise makes it more likely that we'd want to play in a minor.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#6 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2014-November-14, 20:01

View Postgnasher, on 2014-November-14, 16:54, said:

If your hand is worth an invitational 2NT now, why was it worth only1NT on the previous round? Did it improve when RHO raised spades?

2NT obviously shows both minors. That is consistent with the bidding, because:
- We couldn't show both minors on the previous round.
- The spade raise makes it more likely that we'd want to play in a minor.

Couple of subtleties, though.

First, if LHO is using a short club approach, I would have doubled 1S as minors. Granted, the actual auction was different from the original post auction, and I had not thought through that the change was important. But, if double of 1S would be responsive, that affects the different 1NT. ..2NT sequence.

Second, 2NT directly by a passed hand would seem to be a fit jump. Hence, that's not an option.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
1

#7 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2014-November-15, 02:35

geez, ken.. what a convoluted way to write the problem Posted Image

Anyway, agree with your interpretation of 2NT showing a max, on grounds of the meta-rule: "undiscussed bids are natural".
0

#8 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2014-November-15, 03:05

View Postkenrexford, on 2014-November-14, 20:01, said:

Couple of subtleties, though.

Or, putting it another way, "I didn't get the answer that I wanted, so I'll change the question again."

Perhaps it would help if you started again, this time telling us
- The auction that you actually want to discuss, rather than some other auction.
- What your relevant agreements are.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
3

#9 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2014-November-15, 05:38

Dang it. I was trying to make it easy and screwed the pooch.

The actual auction, with subtlties:
P(opens many 11-counts)
1 (could be short, Montreal Relay approach, strong 1NT)
1 overcall (normal)
1 response (4+ for unknown reasons)
1NT (8-11; jumps are fit bids; X would be responsive)
2 (no support doubles, but assuredly 4 anyway)
P
P
2NT
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
1

#10 User is offline   WesleyC 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 878
  • Joined: 2009-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 2014-November-15, 09:49

On the actual real-life auction I think 2NT is shapely minor takeout, probably without heart tolerance but likely with longer clubs.
1

#11 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2014-November-15, 11:18

you're getting colder, ken.. lol
0

#12 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2014-November-15, 11:59

View Postwhereagles, on 2014-November-15, 11:18, said:

you're getting colder, ken.. lol

Actually, all plausible hands will be similar. 3235 and 3145 are not that dissimilar. 2245 also. Perhaps 2245 might be the Platonic ideal. The question may be whether the initial selection between double and 1NT makes deviation from 2245 more likely 3235, 3244, or 3145.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
1

#13 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-November-15, 17:18

I have had a similar auction or at least of the same flavor. After pard opened 1 - 1 overcall and I bid 1nt with 2 diamond stoppers (KQT), 5 clubs to the KQ and out.

After 2 back to me I bid 2nt intended as source of tricks (clubs) with min defense and did get raised to a making game.

This is different but a (hoped for) source of tricks in a minor here?
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#14 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2014-November-15, 18:41

View Postggwhiz, on 2014-November-15, 17:18, said:

I have had a similar auction or at least of the same flavor. After pard opened 1 - 1 overcall and I bid 1nt with 2 diamond stoppers (KQT), 5 clubs to the KQ and out.

After 2 back to me I bid 2nt intended as source of tricks (clubs) with min defense and did get raised to a making game.

This is different but a (hoped for) source of tricks in a minor here?

Yeah, sort of a hedge bid, also. Rather than simply bidding 3C, you bid 2NT to say that you have clubs, with extras, allowing partner more information and options. Passing is one option. Raising another. Converting to 3C a third.

The big questions are whether 3D and/or 3H are options also. Both seems very tight, essentially forcing 2245. So, which do you give up?
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
1

#15 User is offline   dboxley 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 327
  • Joined: 2003-March-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Indianapolis

Posted 2014-November-16, 04:59

View Postkenrexford, on 2014-November-14, 11:23, said:

Had an interesting (perhaps) sequence last night, and I am curious as to whether I am out of my mind (this time -- I will concede general insanity).

The auction at MP, all red, starts:

P(me)-1(could be short)-1-X

1NT-2-P-P-

2NT

First, before reading on, what would you interpret 2NT to mean?

Now,
Spoiler






Minors
1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users