BBO Discussion Forums: Rebids by 4th seat doubler - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Rebids by 4th seat doubler What should they mean?

#1 User is offline   jallerton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,796
  • Joined: 2008-September-12
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-October-29, 13:23



What do the following calls by West mean?

1. 2
2. 2
3. 2

In each case, please provide a typical hand.

Thanks in advance.
1

#2 User is offline   broze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,001
  • Joined: 2011-March-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2014-October-29, 16:56

1. Normal double and cuebid - big hand
2. Normal double and new suit - extras
3. Normal double and bid spades - natural, extras

Not providing example hands because I believe they should be the same as a direct double and bid. Might consider different meanings if 1D is precision or something similar.
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
1

#3 User is offline   deannz 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 2010-October-20

Posted 2014-October-29, 18:19

1) Normal double and bid diamonds = natural (I made a t/o double of spades)
2) Double and bid new suit = extras
3) Double and cue-bid t/o doubled suit = big hand. Doesn't show big hand with spades.

D./
0

#4 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2014-October-29, 18:48

View Postjallerton, on 2014-October-29, 13:23, said:

What do the following calls by West mean?

1. 2
2. 2
3. 2

In each case, please provide a typical hand.

Thanks in advance.


1. Big hand, 18+. Something like Axx KQxx x AKQxx, although the club fit isn't mandatory.

2. Natural 5 cards and around 14-17 H. Say Kxx AKJTx Ax xxx.

3. As above, with majors exchanged. Rule: cue of responder's suit is natural (unless otherwise agreed, ofc).
0

#5 User is offline   chasetb 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 879
  • Joined: 2009-December-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Podunk, backwater USA

Posted 2014-November-01, 01:39

I am assuming that 1 is (3)4+ , so unlikely we will ever want to play in that suit. Therefore:

2 = Usually big hand with support, probably a fit with Clubs but could be a big NT hand without a Diamond stopper.

2 = Larger than average with Hearts, probably 6+ . After all, we can just bid 2 naturally on the first round.

2 = Pretty big hand with Spades. While borderline, I have an example hand of X then a Major below.

I would also say that 2 and 2 should be limited to less than an opening Strong 2 (With HCP, IF it ever comes up), which you can do via 2 and then bidding the Major naturally.

While not the most likely, a hand from a tournament awhile ago convinced me that I needed the Major as natural. Hearts play better than NT, and it's very likely if you bid 2NT instead of 2, partner will raise to 3, going down 1:

"It's not enough to win the tricks that belong to you. Try also for some that belong to the opponents."

"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."

"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."

-Alfred Sheinwold
0

#6 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2014-November-01, 13:13

2 covers a variety of strong hands, including fairly balanced hands unsuited to other action, hands with club support, and hands that are going to insist on game.
2 is natural with 5+ hearts and extra values. Not a one-suiter, which would bid 3.
2 is similar to 2, but specifically shows a spade stopper and denies a diamond stopper.

If I were designing methods for this auction from scratch, I might do something different with the cue-bids, but without agreement I think that's what they mean.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#7 User is offline   wanoff 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: 2012-February-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham,UK

Posted 2014-November-02, 16:52

2 Strong takeout of diamonds. NT,clubs or even spades could be the right strain. (maybe AKJx AQxx x K10xx)
2 5+ hearts, similar strength to double in 2nd followed by 2
2 Strong 5+ spades 4 hearts. (maybe AKJ9x AQxx x Kxx)
0

#8 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2014-November-03, 15:26

Out of 6 replies so far, 5 think 2D is artificial and 1 thinks it is natural.
3 (exactly 50%) think 2S is artificial and 3 think it is natural.

Maybe other shave some thoughts.
I asked Jallerton following an auction I read in the bridge world where at least the two players at the table agreed what 2S meant.
0

#9 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2014-November-03, 16:46

Double then 2 should be 5413 good or similar, I think. We don't need it for the spade one suiters - they either overcall immediately, pass then overcall, or pass then double then bid 2 in progressive order of strength.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users