BBO Discussion Forums: Opener's rebid with a near max - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Opener's rebid with a near max

Poll: Opener's rebid with a near max (21 member(s) have cast votes)

Your rebid?

  1. 2C (15 votes [71.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 71.43%

  2. 3C (5 votes [23.81%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.81%

  3. Would have opened 1NT (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Other (pls elaborate) (1 votes [4.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.76%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2014-October-29, 02:10

 PhantomSac, on 2014-October-28, 20:40, said:

This seems like an example where rebidding 2C works well?

Yes.

Why is everyone finding it so hard to come up with examples? The obvious one is KQxxx xxxx x Jxx. That J is marvellous isn't it?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#22 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2014-October-30, 03:41

Thx all. This is a bit of a theoretical question, as in practice just about all roads lead to a slam. Pard had

AKQTx
KJTx
xx
JT

I think 2 is better, as it makes the rest of the bidding easier. As Roth would say, "If I can live through this round..."
0

#23 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,423
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2014-October-30, 04:55

I play that 2 is forcing (and 3 mini-splinter, and we like that).
Without 2 forcing: 2
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users