BBO Discussion Forums: swan one - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

swan one

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2014-October-17, 03:36



2/1 game forcing.

Hand, can be played here: http://bridgegod.com....php?probid=400
0

#2 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,925
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2014-October-17, 04:00

This hand is much more awkward at MPs than IMPs, there are two lines that work at IMPs in 4, you want to pick one in particular at MPs.
0

#3 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2014-October-17, 04:19

5. Swans play the long suit. I learned that the hard way at Cardiff Posted Image
0

#4 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2014-October-17, 04:43

I ended up in 6 after a strong club opening, I wasn't really happy with my partner but now I think I was mostly at fault

Spoiler

0

#5 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2014-October-17, 07:15

What's wrong with 4? Your auction showed something like a 6-4 clubs/spades. Can't partner declare a preference for spades?
0

#6 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2014-October-17, 07:26

I think 4M over a 4m reopening its a control bid, not a preference. He wasn't enterily sure, but part of the problem comes from the ambiguous 3 bid. Maybe I can realice that when I reopen he knows I have real spades, but that didn't come to my mind at the table.
0

#7 User is offline   manudude03 

  • - - A AKQJT9876543
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,610
  • Joined: 2007-October-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-October-17, 11:38

Well, I managed the very pedestrian 4S making 10 tricks. I noticed two little errors on the site with the commenting though. First of all, I know you're meant to escape inputs for security, but the backslashes shouldn't be there on the client side. Also, the time posted is 17:44:9 as opposed to 17:44:09
Wayne Somerville
1

#8 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2014-October-18, 05:16

View Postmanudude03, on 2014-October-17, 11:38, said:

Well, I managed the very pedestrian 4S making 10 tricks. I noticed two little errors on the site with the commenting though. First of all, I know you're meant to escape inputs for security, but the backslashes shouldn't be there on the client side. Also, the time posted is 17:44:9 as opposed to 17:44:09

This is due to one of web developwers nightmare... when you send your comment, javascript (your computer) shows it to you, and it appears with backslashes and bad times. However if you reload the page (or if other user reads it) it is PHP (the server) who writes it, using their own methods, and those are good. Programming things twice sucks. But I should fix this thing.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users