BBO Discussion Forums: Very small simulation for declarer play? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Very small simulation for declarer play?

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2014-October-01, 10:12

IMP scoring, basic GIB. (I'm still unsure as to when either of these components actually matters.)

The most direct path to 9 tricks is 1♠, 1♥, 2♦ and 5♣. Wouldn't virtually any player lead ♣A at Trick 3, to guard against South having all 3 clubs? (If South shows out on the first round of clubs, you still have a chance to switch to spades and collect 4♠, 1♥, 2♦ and 2♣.)

It cannot be, at IMPs, that the expected value of GIB's chosen line of play is higher. I had stopped posting declarer play issues, but this continues a recent string of "just take your tricks and make your contract" posts.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users