BBO Discussion Forums: Checks for slam after 2nt opening but not 2c? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Checks for slam after 2nt opening but not 2c?

#1 User is offline   AyunuS 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 284
  • Joined: 2011-December-15

Posted 2014-September-23, 17:59

I noticed a bid that I can't seem to figure out. Free robot tourney, MPs. Consider this:

http://tinyurl.com/lfgv35v

And then this:

http://tinyurl.com/p8roxx6

What's the big difference that makes it so slam is worth checking for after 2nt opening but not after 2c opening? The 3c shows the same thing in both cases. And 4s shows 3+ spades in both cases. So what are the differences? Well the 2nt is necessarily balanced and has fewer total points. Both of which should be considered worse at going for 6s.
0

#2 User is offline   steve2005 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,149
  • Joined: 2010-April-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Canada
  • Interests:Bridge duh!

Posted 2014-September-23, 20:00

responder is showing a bigger hand making a free bid over 2 than 2N so doesn't feel compelled to bid on.

still Gib shouldn't be looking for slam opposite a 2N opening just cause it has extras, it doesn't have enough for slam.



Sarcasm is a state of mind
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users