BBO Discussion Forums: Matchpoint game, who pushed too hard? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Matchpoint game, who pushed too hard?

Poll: Matchpoint game, who pushed too hard? (33 member(s) have cast votes)

Who pushed too hard?

  1. North should sign off in 3S (3 votes [9.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

  2. South should only make a single raise (13 votes [39.39%])

    Percentage of vote: 39.39%

  3. Both pushed too much, equally (17 votes [51.52%])

    Percentage of vote: 51.52%

  4. Both actions were fine, unlucky hand (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 User is offline   mcphee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,512
  • Joined: 2003-February-16

Posted 2014-August-20, 02:56

South is thinking he has a limit raise, I'm thinking it isn't so. For me this is a constructive raise and South got carried away thinking because he had strong trumps partner hand was outside and he wanted to him him bid it. N while holding some shape should really take the low road playing pairs. Being agressive at pairs pays off some days, but being conservative pays off more often.
0

#22 User is offline   Trump Echo 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 119
  • Joined: 2014-February-27

Posted 2014-August-20, 04:38

I find South at fault.

If I held South's hand, I'd have jumped to 3 Spades directly as a preempt after the double. Partner would pass.
0

#23 User is offline   m1cha 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 397
  • Joined: 2014-February-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Germany

Posted 2014-August-20, 16:42

View Posthumilities, on 2014-August-19, 08:05, said:

2NT= limit or better, 4 trump


Matchpoints, this low board really dragged us down at the end. Who pushed too hard?


In the system officially played in Germany, you add 2 pts to the S hand for the nine-card fit because it is often worth a trick. Considering this, I find S's call acceptable although the value of the J is questionable.

N on the other hand should have clear extras for going to game but has
- minimum HCP count
- the first doubleton is standard, not an extra
- for the other doubleton to count positive, you want AK in a long suit
- the trump suit is bad
- on the positive side, just a good count of Aces and Tens.

To my opintion, if you want equal blame to both partners, you should bid
1 (X) 2NT (p) 3 (p) 3 (p) p (p)
and make it. ;)

By the way, the contract is not that bad. Just consider the J is in rather than : You will probably make 4 because you find the Q.
0

#24 User is offline   lrussell 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 61
  • Joined: 2009-September-01
  • Location:Kelowna, BC, Canada

Posted 2014-August-20, 17:02

Both were pushy but South's ace-less, 4-3-3-3 pancake 9 count is not a limit raise. South to blame.
Lorne Russell
0

#25 User is offline   steve2005 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,148
  • Joined: 2010-April-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Canada
  • Interests:Bridge duh!

Posted 2014-August-20, 20:09

South not even close to having their bid.

North pretty close to having their bid but just hate having 7 pts tied up in doubleton

What North needs is a artificial 3/3 bid asking for a good limit raise or maybe even as a natural game try



Sarcasm is a state of mind
0

#26 User is offline   bdegrande 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 36
  • Joined: 2006-February-22

Posted 2014-August-20, 21:17

South takes more of the blame. That hand has a lot of negatives. It is aceless, it is 4-3-3-3 and with a known at least 9 card fit, the Q may not be a working value. North's had is not too bad/ With two aces, a king, and two doubletons, it is a lot better than some minimums. It may be a close decision to bid game, but it at least reasonable. South's hand isn't close to a 2NT bid.
1

#27 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,029
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-August-21, 05:24

Both.

South is 4333 and submin on HCP, and North has a min opener.

Why is this even asked?

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#28 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,029
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-August-21, 05:32

View Postm1cha, on 2014-August-20, 16:42, said:

In the system officially played in Germany, you add 2 pts to the S hand for the nine-card fit because it is often worth a trick.
<snip>


One of the reason being, you dont care a lot, who has the Queen of Trumps, unfortunately, we have it.
It may not be part of the official documents, but if you are in the upgrade department, you should also
know, when to downgrade: 4333 is a downgrading factor (-1), and the jack is certainly anything than full
value. Single raises have a range from 6-10 in the official German system (may depend on the version of
the document, one is looking at), so after doing the math the limit raise is overbidding.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#29 User is offline   yunling 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 652
  • Joined: 2012-February-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shenzhen, China
  • Interests:meteorology

Posted 2014-August-21, 06:02

At least 90% for south. 4333 shape is no good and KQTx in partner's 5 card suit is a big minus. I rate the hand as a so-so 8 count.
For north hand, I know I'm in the minority but I think it worth 13. Jxxxx is no longer a minus when you have a 9-card fit, aces are good, so is DT.
Don't know your opening style, but north is probably ok if you open a lot of 11s.
0

#30 User is offline   m1cha 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 397
  • Joined: 2014-February-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Germany

Posted 2014-August-21, 16:14

@P_Marlowe:

I agree on most points, particularly on the 4333 distribution. I changed my mind about the J though. There's a good probability of opener having Qx(xx) or Kx(xx) and E having the other honors in which case J is likely to make a trick, so I think the J is worth its single point.

Anyway, of course S is stretching the hand by bidding 2NT. I just meant I find it 'acceptable' here even if you play the limit raise as 11 - 12 because with (good) 10 pts at least we're close. While for accepting a game invitation I'd want to see 14 pts and I'd rate the N hand closer to 12 than to 13.
0

#31 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2014-August-21, 16:28

If you don't have a mixed raise available, I like 2NT here, just so long as partner expects it - there's still room for a try.
0

#32 User is offline   runewell 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 63
  • Joined: 2005-June-11

Posted 2014-August-21, 18:57

South's bid is waaaay worse. As others have said, only a flat 9 count is nothing remotely close to a limit raise.

North's action is OK since he has a several prime controls (aces and kings tends to be worth more). I think it's a coin flip between 3S and 4S after the X, but a simple pass after 2S.
0

#33 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2014-August-21, 19:04

View PostP_Marlowe, on 2014-August-21, 05:24, said:

Both.

South is 4333 and submin on HCP, and North has a min opener.

Why is this even asked?

With kind regards
Marlowe

Obviously, because North and South are disagreeing about it and wanted impartial opinions.
0

#34 User is offline   Vampyr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,611
  • Joined: 2009-September-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:London

Posted 2014-August-21, 19:12

View Postrunewell, on 2014-August-21, 18:57, said:

I think it's a coin flip between 3S and 4S


Wouldn't that mean it's just right for a game try?
I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones -- Albert Einstein
1

#35 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,190
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2014-August-21, 19:18

Sorry, but I have seen no system that uses a 4333 8-count(only point count slaves count Jxx) as anything other than a simple raise - maybe constructive raise, but certainly not a limit raise.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." Black Lives Matter. / "I need ammunition, not a ride." Zelensky
0

#36 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2014-August-21, 19:19

View PostMickyB, on 2014-August-21, 16:28, said:

If you don't have a mixed raise available, I like 2NT here, just so long as partner expects it - there's still room for a try.

IMO, one should not make a mixed raise on a 4333 hand.
0

#37 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2014-August-21, 20:01

I know what our definitions of "constructive raise" vs "mixed raise" are, and I won't convince anyone successfully. So that doesn't matter.

However, if this were a true ATB, I would give no blame to North. South invited game without an invite; North should never have been given the opportunity to make a bad acceptance.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#38 User is offline   operator 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 2011-January-19

Posted 2014-August-21, 21:04

View Postmikeh, on 2014-August-19, 10:04, said:

Both overbid

I am not a big fan of mixed raises at the best of times, but the S hand is a much better mixed than limit raise...indeed, it isn't even close to a limit imo.

It would be useful to play methods over the double. For me, I play transfers starting with redouble, which shows a balanced, notrump type of hand, 8+ hcp. So 2 would show a sound raise to 2, which is what this is worth (2 would show a weak raise).

Having said that, the bad call by S should merely have got the partnership to the 3-level, which seems safe enough.

N committed a basic error in hand evaluation.

Having 5 controls is a good thing, and often justifies the taking of a rosy view, but it is very important to look to where the cards are. High cards in short suits are not worth as much as are high cards in long suits, where the high cards can help establish the low cards as length winners. Here, the club AK are not worth as much as they would be were they in long suits.


In addition, even giving the club cards more weight than I think they deserve, we have the same flat 12 count we opened. Yes, it was a clear opening bid (imo) but that doesn't make it a hand with extras, and the limit raise asks us to bid game if we have some extras. We don't.

Finally, the Losing Trick Count can be a reasonably good metric in close situations. I don't, actually, consider this to be close, but if you did, then count the losers. A LTC of 7 suggests a minimum hand. One shouldn't accept the limit with that sort of LTC. Were the LTC to be 6 (such as Jxxxx xx AQxx AK) then one ought to accept the raise.

Both players misbid, but the partnership should have survived S's call, since N had no semblance of acceptance

As for the bonus question, about Meckwell, I suggest you take a look at the hands on which they (and other top pairs) bid 'light high card' games. They do NOT bid games just because they hold a combined 22 or 23 hcp. They do stretch, a lot, for 3N, but when they bid light major games, they do it on sound principles, based (usually, it seems to me) on shape and degrees of fit.


Full support. Great appreciation of hi cards true value. Mike Laurence fan? :)
0

#39 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,666
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2014-August-22, 02:25

View Postoperator, on 2014-August-21, 21:04, said:

Mike Laurence fan? :)

Mike is a Canadian international and Bermuda Bowl player. Most of us who have posted here for a long time are MikeH fans, probably more so than MikeL ones.
(-: Zel :-)

Happy New Year everyone!
0

#40 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2014-August-22, 05:52

View PostZelandakh, on 2014-August-22, 02:25, said:

Mike is a Canadian international and Bermuda Bowl player. Most of us who have posted here for a long time are MikeH fans, probably more so than MikeL ones.


You beat me to it. I would take our Mike over his, even if the last name was misspelled and it was actually Lawrence. :-P
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users