BBO Discussion Forums: Precision 2C opening - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Precision 2C opening dumb question

#1 User is offline   Shugart23 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 606
  • Joined: 2013-July-07

Posted 2014-April-04, 11:17

I hope you dont mind a dumb question, but I was reading the other topic on opening preemptively weak 2 suiters and printed off the ACBL GCC convention chart to review it.

I open the standard 2C precision showing 11-15 with 5 clubs and 4 card Major OR 6 clubs. But I cant see that the GCC allows me to do this . What am I missing ? I have been opening 2C this way for several years.
0

#2 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,071
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2014-April-04, 12:39

It's a natural bid and an opening bid (showing values, approximately 10+ unless pre-alerted) so probably included in...

1. An opening suit bid or response is considered natural if in a minor it
shows three or more cards in that suit and in a major it shows four or
more cards in that suit. A no trump opening or overcall is natural if
not unbalanced (generally, no singleton or void and only one or two
doubletons).
0

#3 User is offline   steve2005 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,149
  • Joined: 2010-April-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Canada
  • Interests:Bridge duh!

Posted 2014-April-04, 15:39

Yes this Precision bid belongs in the Natural Bidding Discussion section lol

just like when you open 1 you might have a 4-card major same reasoning allows 2 to possibly have a 4-card major

only difference is you promise 3 for 1 and 5 for 2
Sarcasm is a state of mind
0

#4 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2014-April-09, 16:45

View Poststeve2005, on 2014-April-04, 15:39, said:

Yes this Precision bid belongs in the Natural Bidding Discussion section lol

No, it belongs in the Simple Rulings forum. Please don't waste the time of all the forum members who couldn't care less about the ACBL's arcane regulations.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#5 User is offline   johnu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,846
  • Joined: 2008-September-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-April-09, 19:48

View Postmgoetze, on 2014-April-09, 16:45, said:

No, it belongs in the Simple Rulings forum. Please don't waste the time of all the forum members who couldn't care less about the ACBL's arcane regulations.


A little snappy :rolleyes: The OP was the one who specified ACBL GCC.
0

#6 User is online   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,107
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2014-April-10, 10:51

What happens is that if you *promise* a second suit (as opposed to "promise a second suit if I don't have N cards in the bid suit"), that makes it conventional, and certainly that would not be allowed (viz the "new" part of the GCC that specifically allows "2M to promise M+m"). But Standard Precision 2 doesn't do that - "most" of the time, you will have 6+ clubs, so while you may have the major, you certainly don't promise one.
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#7 User is offline   HighLow21 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 781
  • Joined: 2012-January-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-April-17, 14:01

View Postmgoetze, on 2014-April-09, 16:45, said:

No, it belongs in the Simple Rulings forum. Please don't waste the time of all the forum members who couldn't care less about the ACBL's arcane regulations.

Another example of mgoetze being an arrogant, snippy little jerk.
There is a big difference between a good decision and a good result. Let's keep our posts about good decisions rather than "gotcha" results!
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users