Help
<br>
Recent IMPs deal.
Pick the bones out of this disaster where slam has better chances than 3NT.
2NT by South would have been natural.
Page 1 of 1
Sorry Partner
#1
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 354
- Joined: 2012-February-25
- Gender:Male
- Location:Birmingham,UK
Posted 2013-December-01, 05:53
Recent IMPs deal.
Pick the bones out of this disaster where slam has better chances than 3NT.
2NT by South would have been natural.
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,667
- Joined: 2006-May-18
- Gender:Not Telling
Posted 2013-December-01, 07:12
South has an absolute minimum and slam has decent play. North has a completely different hand from the one the bidding showed. Why is this even a question?
(-: Zel :-)
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,211
- Joined: 2006-April-22
Posted 2013-December-01, 08:21
Pick the bones out of this disaster where slam has better chances than 3NT.
2NT by South would have been natural. - wanoff
*** Q-bid with one control? And that didn't light a "grand" fire??
2Nt with this bal, quacks, stops hand.
Then 3D by North at least finds a good C-fit to land in slam try.
*** When would South show his C:Qxxx support??
Of course 3Nt after his stre-e-etch Q-bid last round.
Still North is worth his own 4D Q-bid, esp if 4Nt is a landing spot (not keys ask).
2NT by South would have been natural. - wanoff
*** Q-bid with one control? And that didn't light a "grand" fire??
2Nt with this bal, quacks, stops hand.
Then 3D by North at least finds a good C-fit to land in slam try.
*** When would South show his C:Qxxx support??
Of course 3Nt after his stre-e-etch Q-bid last round.
Still North is worth his own 4D Q-bid, esp if 4Nt is a landing spot (not keys ask).
#4
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2013-December-01, 12:07
This one is pretty clear, south took the time to offer a raise before bidding 2 or 3NT to offer alternatives instead of bidding directly, north was asleep.
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,207
- Joined: 2009-April-26
- Gender:Male
- Location:Wellington, NZ
Posted 2013-December-01, 21:58
I disagree.
North's pass of 3NT could have been right though I don't really like it. But South's 3NT instead of 4♣ was the worst call and rates to be a silly contract most of the time, and merely an inferior one otherwise.
North's pass of 3NT could have been right though I don't really like it. But South's 3NT instead of 4♣ was the worst call and rates to be a silly contract most of the time, and merely an inferior one otherwise.
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,465
- Joined: 2006-January-07
- Location:Montreal Canada
- Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.
Posted 2013-December-02, 00:19
North should just bid 4D (for me its 100% exclusion), south hand doesnt look that good for slam but with only 2 pts wasted it think it deserve to make another forward move and north will auto accept.
At MP i have some sympathy for passing 3NT but at imps its a joke.
At MP i have some sympathy for passing 3NT but at imps its a joke.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#7
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 354
- Joined: 2012-February-25
- Gender:Male
- Location:Birmingham,UK
Posted 2013-December-02, 03:19
nigel_k, on 2013-December-01, 21:58, said:
I disagree.
North's pass of 3NT could have been right though I don't really like it. But South's 3NT instead of 4♣ was the worst call and rates to be a silly contract most of the time, and merely an inferior one otherwise.
North's pass of 3NT could have been right though I don't really like it. But South's 3NT instead of 4♣ was the worst call and rates to be a silly contract most of the time, and merely an inferior one otherwise.
This was Norths view.
Couldn't 5C be silly though if North has a singleton diamond. There a 9 possible singletons and half of them improve 3NT.
Could North be Jxx AKx x AKxxxx on the bidding ?
#8
- 2011 Poster of The Year winner
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,002
- Joined: 2010-July-08
- Gender:Male
Posted 2013-December-02, 03:28
wanoff, on 2013-December-02, 03:19, said:
This was Norths view.
Couldn't 5C be silly though if North has a singleton diamond. There a 9 possible singletons and half of them improve 3NT.
Could North be xxx AKx x AKxxxx on the bidding ?
Couldn't 5C be silly though if North has a singleton diamond. There a 9 possible singletons and half of them improve 3NT.
Could North be xxx AKx x AKxxxx on the bidding ?
Yes it's clearly an lol north
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#9
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 553
- Joined: 2004-March-29
- Gender:Male
- Location:Belgium
Posted 2013-December-02, 08:54
I would have bid 1nt with the South hand... But that is besides the point: North should never pass 3nt.
Steven
Steven
Page 1 of 1