BBO Discussion Forums: Jogging opponents' memory - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Jogging opponents' memory

#1 User is offline   gartinmale 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 80
  • Joined: 2010-December-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, IL
  • Interests:statistics, bridge, sound recording and editing, crosswords, American football and baseball, making redoubled contracts (16 out of 35 and counting...)

Posted 2012-October-29, 10:36

Yesterday in an ACBL Swiss, sitting South, the following auction occurred:



Partner opened a strong artificial 1, West doubled an artificial 1, and nobody saw any reason to disturb it (particularly not me, as I held Kxxxx of hearts).

West led the heart T. When dummy hit I noted that we had an eight card heart fit missing the QT9, and that West had helpfully picked up the suit for me.

It was clear when East showed up with the heart Q and both followed to two rounds of trump that West did not intend the double to show hearts. They had briefly discussed their defenses before the match and so had an agreement about the double, although it wasn't clear to me what that was. It was also barely possible that our counterparts would be in 4H at the other table. To maximize the potential for overtricks it seemed necessary to figure out exactly what West's double showed - I suspected either 'the "unbid" suits' or 'suction: spades OR both minors', since they had discussed suction overcalls before the match, but it could have been something else as well - say, takeout of hearts.

1) In a situation like this, is it legal/ethical to ask East questions until he remembers their agreement? (At the table I refrained).

2) Similarly, I remember reading about a situation in a national pairs where Kit Woolsey opened a precision 1D, his partner bid 1H, and his RHO overcalled 2D (or some analogous auction - my memory isn't terrific). The point is that Kit's responses depended upon whether or not 2D was natural or artificial. His LHO remembered they had an agreement but did not remember what it was. Eventually the director sent LHO away from the table and had RHO announce to Kit and his partner what meaning he intended. If this is appropriate during the bidding, why not the play?
0

#2 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,398
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-October-29, 11:56

I think this is one of those situations where experienced players are expected to protect themselves. Once dummy comes down, it's pretty obvious that the double was special, and you certainly have a right to know what the agreement is. Ask East, and if he's not sure call the director. I'd expect him to do similarly to the director in your Woolsey story -- I don't see why it should matter whether it's during the auction or play.

#3 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,562
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2012-October-29, 12:06

Did you look at their system card?
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#4 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,398
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-October-29, 12:14

View Postblackshoe, on 2012-October-29, 12:06, said:

Did you look at their system card?

He said he heard them discussing this right before the match. Seems like there's a good chance it wouldn't have made it onto the CC.

#5 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2012-October-29, 12:22

It is legal to ask questions about their agreements as long as you are doing so for your own benefit, and not partner's.
Chris Gibson
0

#6 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,562
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2012-October-29, 12:26

View Postbarmar, on 2012-October-29, 12:14, said:

He said he heard them discussing this right before the match. Seems like there's a good chance it wouldn't have made it onto the CC.

Granted. If it was me, I'd still look. :)

View PostCSGibson, on 2012-October-29, 12:22, said:

It is legal to ask questions about their agreements as long as you are doing so for your own benefit, and not partner's.

Not solely for partner's benefit, surely. Your construction suggests that if partner may benefit from the answer, you cannot ask, and that is not the case.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#7 User is offline   gartinmale 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 80
  • Joined: 2010-December-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, IL
  • Interests:statistics, bridge, sound recording and editing, crosswords, American football and baseball, making redoubled contracts (16 out of 35 and counting...)

Posted 2012-October-29, 14:09

Nothing on their system card.

I was declarer, not dummy, so fortunately the asking would have been for my benefit.

Let's say they hadn't discussed anything. Would I have been allowed to ask what defense(s) they play to a strong club? To a strong club and a negative response?
0

#8 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,562
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2012-October-29, 15:35

Once the opening lead is faced, dummy is not allowed to ask any questions about the bidding until the hand is over.

Whether they've discussed anything does not affect your right to ask questions about the actual auction. In this case, if they have a defense to strong club auctions, but have not discussed strong diamond auctions, it seems to me their defense to strong club auctions is pertinent, since it's reasonable to extrapolate from them to the actual situation. The basic principle is that when any question is asked, all pertinent information should be disclosed, so in theory if you ask about their agreements with respect to strong diamond auctions, and they don't have any, but have agreements with respect to strong club auctions, the latter agreements should be provided automatically. If they aren't mentioned, you're certainly entitled to ask. If they balk, call the director.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#9 User is offline   gartinmale 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 80
  • Joined: 2010-December-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago, IL
  • Interests:statistics, bridge, sound recording and editing, crosswords, American football and baseball, making redoubled contracts (16 out of 35 and counting...)

Posted 2012-October-29, 17:32

Again, I was declarer. I don't know where the idea of dummy asking came into this, but if it was something I wrote that was unclear please tell me so that I may reword it / be more careful in the future.

I appreciate the answers - it was unclear to me where the limitations came in here had they neglected a defense.

Unfortunately we are often in a situation like this playing a strong diamond system. If partner opens 1 and righty doubles, the meaning of our redouble depends upon the meaning of double (it is one thing if X shows diamonds, another if X shows the majors, and a third if X shows general values/takeout of diamonds - all three of which people have played against us without discussion. We do pre-alert the strong diamond but many pairs decline to discuss a defense).

In this case we were able to get out of it okay, although partner's pass over the double would have had a different meaning if it had been known to be, say, suction.
0

#10 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,562
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2012-October-29, 17:52

You mentioned that you were not dummy. I just wanted to clarify for the general reader that dummy isn't allowed to ask, though I was pretty sure you knew that. B-)

If people are saying X is "undiscussed", and yet both members of the pair are on the same page as to its meaning, I would wonder what they neglected to disclose, unless the chosen meaning is "I have that suit", which might be considered "knowledge generally available to bridge players". Or maybe not. I confess the logic behind what is and is not "general bridge knowledge" sometimes escapes me.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#11 User is offline   bluejak 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,686
  • Joined: 2007-August-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Liverpool, UK
  • Interests:Bridge Laws, Cats, Railways, Transport timetables

Posted 2012-October-29, 18:09

View Postgartinmale, on 2012-October-29, 10:36, said:

Eventually the director sent LHO away from the table and had RHO announce to Kit and his partner what meaning he intended. If this is appropriate during the bidding, why not the play?

It is appropriate during the play.
David Stevenson

Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
0

#12 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,398
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-October-29, 23:02

View Postgartinmale, on 2012-October-29, 14:09, said:

Let's say they hadn't discussed anything. Would I have been allowed to ask what defense(s) they play to a strong club? To a strong club and a negative response?

From Law 20F:

Quote

1. During the auction and before the final pass, any player may request, but only at his own turn to call, an explanation of the opponents’ prior auction. He is entitled to know about calls actually made, about relevant alternative calls available that were not made, and about relevant inferences from the choice of action where these are matters of partnership understanding....

2. After the final pass and throughout the play period, either defender at his own turn to play may request an explanation of the opposing auction. At his turn to play from his hand or from dummy declarer may request an explanation of a defender’s call or card play understandings. Explanations should be given on a like basis to 1 and by the partner of the player whose action is explained.

I don't think that allows you to ask about calls that would be made in a totally different auction. But maybe if they haven't discussed a defense to strong , their defense to strong could be considered a "relevant inference".

#13 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2012-October-30, 04:26

View Postgartinmale, on 2012-October-29, 17:32, said:

Unfortunately we are often in a situation like this playing a strong diamond system. If partner opens 1 and righty doubles, the meaning of our redouble depends upon the meaning of double (it is one thing if X shows diamonds, another if X shows the majors, and a third if X shows general values/takeout of diamonds - all three of which people have played against us without discussion. We do pre-alert the strong diamond but many pairs decline to discuss a defense).

So make an agreement about what you play over an undiscussed double.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
2

#14 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,562
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2012-October-30, 08:41

I was thinking "agree to act as if it shows the suit doubled". :ph34r:
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#15 User is offline   mjj29 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 576
  • Joined: 2009-July-11

Posted 2012-October-31, 03:06

I also play a strong diamond, this also comes up a lot for us. It's definitely fine to ask about their defense in similar situations (such as a strong club) and use the inferences from that. You probably want to agree with your partner how your going to treat that in advance though. If 1C-X is clubs and hearts, for example, do you think they will play 1D-X as clubs and hearts, or diamonds and spades. You're also not allowed to discuss that during the hand (-:

The really interesting question, I think, is what you do when they don't look at your card 'because it's a two-board round', you open 1D (alerted) and it's doubled without asking what it means. Maybe that's obviously takeout of diamonds though (-:
0

#16 User is offline   CamHenry 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 463
  • Joined: 2009-August-03

Posted 2012-October-31, 04:16

View Postmjj29, on 2012-October-31, 03:06, said:

I also play a strong diamond, this also comes up a lot for us. It's definitely fine to ask about their defense in similar situations (such as a strong club) and use the inferences from that. You probably want to agree with your partner how your going to treat that in advance though. If 1C-X is clubs and hearts, for example, do you think they will play 1D-X as clubs and hearts, or diamonds and spades. You're also not allowed to discuss that during the hand (-:

The really interesting question, I think, is what you do when they don't look at your card 'because it's a two-board round', you open 1D (alerted) and it's doubled without asking what it means. Maybe that's obviously takeout of diamonds though (-:


I maintain that "double them for penalties if at all possible" is a good policy here!
0

#17 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2012-November-11, 18:25

View Postblackshoe, on 2012-October-29, 12:06, said:

Did you look at their system card?


Where would you look?
0

#18 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,562
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2012-November-11, 18:30

View PostTimG, on 2012-November-11, 18:25, said:

Where would you look?

Probably in the approximately two square inches of space available at the bottom of the front of the card. :P
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users