Help
http://tinyurl.com/d7xbk6t
It seems that GIB will bid 3S both with the 3 card limit raise and with 3 card spades support and a hand not good enough to bid 2S. Perhaps GIB should bid 4S here instead?
Page 1 of 1
Bidding a non-constructive major raise over jump-shift
#1
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 232
- Joined: 2010-April-12
- Gender:Male
- Location:New York
Posted 2012-May-17, 15:36
#2
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 284
- Joined: 2011-December-15
Posted 2012-May-18, 00:27
Wow, why in the world is the 3♠ 11-12 pts? And what a pathetic 11-12 pts it has. Well, it got to the right place, so this wasn't a bid deal. Is there some way you can think of that it wouldn't reach the right final bid with this method?
#3
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 232
- Joined: 2010-April-12
- Gender:Male
- Location:New York
Posted 2012-May-18, 00:45
AyunuS, on 2012-May-18, 00:27, said:
Wow, why in the world is the 3♠ 11-12 pts? And what a pathetic 11-12 pts it has. Well, it got to the right place, so this wasn't a bid deal. Is there some way you can think of that it wouldn't reach the right final bid with this method?
In this auction, responder could have a "bad" limit raise and one of 3 spades and 4 spades should show that. Responder also has to have a way to bid a bad raise to 2 spades and a preference to spades. Preferably the same bid does not show all of these hand types.
#4
- Group: Yellows
- Posts: 1,317
- Joined: 2007-December-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Bulgaria
Posted 2012-June-02, 13:28
Fixed behavior which allowed this. So GIB supposedly won't disguise weak hand as hand which was fitting 1NT-3♠ invitational.
It will close to 4♠ with the particular hand.
It will close to 4♠ with the particular hand.
Page 1 of 1