Maybe. What I read was that she would intentionally mislead the opponents, and if caught out, lie to the director.
In her most recent post she says that she thinks or knows that they want an explanation of the continutations (not sure if "Jacoby" is even accurate if the continuations are not as originally set out) but will not give it to them without further questioning. She admits that it is unethical but doesn't seem committed to not doing it again.
I think that Jillybean has a responsibility here. She has (one dares to hope) picked up a rudimentary understanding of the Laws from reading these forums, and is content not to follow them. Ignorance can no longer be an excuse, so I hope that PPs follow and will make an impression.