# BBO Discussion Forums: Rating Players - BBO Discussion Forums

• 7 Pages
• « First
• 5
• 6
• 7

## Rating Players Basic theory

### #121Dinarius

• Group: Full Members
• Posts: 130
• Joined: 2015-February-11
• Gender:Male
• Location:Ireland

Posted 2015-February-13, 03:37

diana_eva, on 2015-February-13, 03:30, said:

BBO Skill is not a BBO page, and not part of BBO.

Yes, I know. But, thanks for clarifying it for those who might not.

It would be nice to have something like it though.

Self-assessment is a joke.

D.
0

### #122dtlq1

• Group: Members
• Posts: 7
• Joined: 2016-April-08

Posted 2017-August-09, 10:39

With the introduction of free daylong tournaments there is a reasonable base for a rating system. You could get an initial rating after like 10 played tournaments and go from there.
Yes it could be slightly biased by "exploiting" GIB behavior and also people not playing 2/1 would have a bit of a disadvantage , but I think it is still viable.
To try to rate hands played with random partners,for example on the main Bridge Club could never result in an adequate rating. It just has to be individual performance vs "neutral" robots.
1

### #123helene_t

• The Abbess
• Posts: 15,435
• Joined: 2004-April-22
• Gender:Female
• Location:Hamilton, New Zealand

Posted 2017-August-09, 14:48

dtlq1, on 2017-August-09, 10:39, said:

With the introduction of free daylong tournaments there is a reasonable base for a rating system.

Yes. I've wondered if the purpose of offering those tourneys was to make a rating system.

But if it becomes "official", it will encourage cheating.
Jesus! You have 7 count 5332 hand and pd passed 1 NT ffs! Are you planning to compete to 4 level or DBL a partscore with this shape and/or tricks? People who spend too much time in D.T topic started to talk like him --- MrAce
0

### #124jeffford76

• Group: Full Members
• Posts: 630
• Joined: 2007-October-30
• Gender:Male
• Location:Redmond, WA

Posted 2017-August-10, 11:41

Dinarius, on 2015-February-13, 03:18, said:

Someone who calls himself/herself '<REDACTED>' rates themselves as World Class. BBO Skill rates them as Intermediate, admittedly provisionally over the last month.

Are we really allowing calling out of random users now in the forums?
0

### #125diana_eva

• Posts: 4,123
• Joined: 2009-July-26
• Gender:Female
• Location:bucharest / romania

Posted 2017-August-10, 12:52

jeffford76, on 2017-August-10, 11:41, said:

Are we really allowing calling out of random users now in the forums?

No, that was a slip on my side. I thought i edited out the name when I originally replied to that post.

### #126barmar

• Posts: 17,282
• Joined: 2004-August-21
• Gender:Male

Posted 2017-August-11, 10:06

jeffford76, on 2017-August-10, 11:41, said:

Are we really allowing calling out of random users now in the forums?

Now? That post was over 2 years old.

### #127jeffford76

• Group: Full Members
• Posts: 630
• Joined: 2007-October-30
• Gender:Male
• Location:Redmond, WA

Posted 2017-August-11, 15:57

Sorry - there was a new post in the thread which made it show up in new posts for me and I didn't notice the original was that old.
0

### #128sharzers

• Group: Members
• Posts: 1
• Joined: 2017-August-11

Posted 2017-August-11, 23:21

Have you taken into account that most players in BBO that THINK they are 'reasonable' or even think they are quite 'good' players, don't have a clue about even the basics of this game. If I were to ask some basic bridge questions, many if not all self-rated 'advanced' players wouldn't be able to string together even a simple coherent response
0

### #129gentgiant

• Group: Members
• Posts: 4
• Joined: 2017-June-20

Posted 2017-August-28, 05:26

sharzers, on 2017-August-11, 23:21, said:

Have you taken into account that most players in BBO that THINK they are 'reasonable' or even think they are quite 'good' players, don't have a clue about even the basics of this game. If I were to ask some basic bridge questions, many if not all self-rated 'advanced' players wouldn't be able to string together even a simple coherent response

It's noticeable, too, that many who self-describe themselves as expert or advanced, are very poor players of the cards and usually the rudest players around.
0